Overcoming Limitations in Raft Footing Design: Alternative Approaches to Uniform Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Analysis

Authors

  • Ted Tse Binnies Hong Kong Limited Author
  • Ka-Ming Lee Binnies Hong Kong Limited Author
  • Jeffrey Lam Binnies Hong Kong Limited Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.7.7.24

Abstract

Raft footing is a cost and time effective foundation solution for building and infrastructure development. By eliminating the need for deep piling, raft foundation significantly reduces embodied carbon, construction time, capital expenditure and disturbances to surroundings. In current industry practice, the Winkler Spring Model is commonly employed for shallow foundation design. This approach simulates the founding soil as a series of independent spring supports defined by the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks) for analysis using structural software such as SAFE. However, the simplified method for estimating ks and the assumption of uniform subgrade support across the entire raft footing have limitations, often producing unrealistic settlement and differential results. Misinterpreted subgrade values may lead to the rejection of the raft footing option and necessitating to opt for a more costly and time-consuming piling foundations. This paper explores an alternative approach to estimate the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks) in a more comprehensive manner using geotechnical finite element software PLAXIS 3D. This method can capture complex subsurface conditions and soil-structure interaction effects, allowing the distribution of ks to vary spatially across the raft. The outcome provides a more accurate and realistic ks estimation, ensuring better decision-making in the design of raft footings.

References

European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – Part 1: General rules: European Committee for Standardization

Geotechnical Engineering Office. GEO Publication No. 1/2006 Foundation Design and Construction: Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR

Harry G. Poulos, 2000, Foundation Settlement Analysis – Practice Versus Research

Hans-Georg Kempfert, H.K. 2006 Chapter 5, Excavations and Foundations in Soft Soils: 337-347: Springer

Joseph E. Bowles, P.E., S.E.1996 Chapter 9.6, Foundation Analysis and Design: McGraw-Hill Book Co

Karl Terzaghi, 1955. Evaluation of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction

Larkela A., L.A. 2013, Determination of Distribution of modulus of subgrade reaction: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Paris, 2013

Meyerhof, G. G., 1953. Some Recent Foundation Research and its Application to Design: Struct. Eng., 31(6) 151–167.

Omer Mughieda, Mohamed Sherif Mehana and Kenan Hazirbaba, 2017, Effect of soil subgrade modulus on raft foundation behavior: ASCMCES-17, MATEC Web of Conferences 120, 06010

Samuel E. French, P.E. 1999. Design of Shallow Foundation; ASCE Press

Ted Tse, Ka-Ming Lee and Ted Lam, 2024, Use of Compressible Layer for Raft Footing Design with Winkler Method: The HKIE Geotechnical Division Annual Seminar 2024

The Buildings Department. Code of Practice for Foundation 2017: The Building Department, HKSAR

The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers. An Explanatory Handbook to the Code of Practice for Foundation 2017: Civil Engineering and Development Department, The Hong Kong Institution of Engineer

Vesic, A.B. [1961], Beams on elastic subgrade and Winkler’s Hypothesis, Proc. 5 th. Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. Found. Engrg., Paris, p.p. 845-50.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21

How to Cite

[1]
Ted Tse, Ka-Ming Lee, and Jeffrey Lam, “Overcoming Limitations in Raft Footing Design: Alternative Approaches to Uniform Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Analysis ”, AIJR Proc., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 271–283, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.21467/proceedings.7.7.24.