Overcoming Limitations in Raft Footing Design: Alternative Approaches to Uniform Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.7.7.24Abstract
Raft footing is a cost and time effective foundation solution for building and infrastructure development. By eliminating the need for deep piling, raft foundation significantly reduces embodied carbon, construction time, capital expenditure and disturbances to surroundings. In current industry practice, the Winkler Spring Model is commonly employed for shallow foundation design. This approach simulates the founding soil as a series of independent spring supports defined by the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks) for analysis using structural software such as SAFE. However, the simplified method for estimating ks and the assumption of uniform subgrade support across the entire raft footing have limitations, often producing unrealistic settlement and differential results. Misinterpreted subgrade values may lead to the rejection of the raft footing option and necessitating to opt for a more costly and time-consuming piling foundations. This paper explores an alternative approach to estimate the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks) in a more comprehensive manner using geotechnical finite element software PLAXIS 3D. This method can capture complex subsurface conditions and soil-structure interaction effects, allowing the distribution of ks to vary spatially across the raft. The outcome provides a more accurate and realistic ks estimation, ensuring better decision-making in the design of raft footings.
References
European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – Part 1: General rules: European Committee for Standardization
Geotechnical Engineering Office. GEO Publication No. 1/2006 Foundation Design and Construction: Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR
Harry G. Poulos, 2000, Foundation Settlement Analysis – Practice Versus Research
Hans-Georg Kempfert, H.K. 2006 Chapter 5, Excavations and Foundations in Soft Soils: 337-347: Springer
Joseph E. Bowles, P.E., S.E.1996 Chapter 9.6, Foundation Analysis and Design: McGraw-Hill Book Co
Karl Terzaghi, 1955. Evaluation of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction
Larkela A., L.A. 2013, Determination of Distribution of modulus of subgrade reaction: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Paris, 2013
Meyerhof, G. G., 1953. Some Recent Foundation Research and its Application to Design: Struct. Eng., 31(6) 151–167.
Omer Mughieda, Mohamed Sherif Mehana and Kenan Hazirbaba, 2017, Effect of soil subgrade modulus on raft foundation behavior: ASCMCES-17, MATEC Web of Conferences 120, 06010
Samuel E. French, P.E. 1999. Design of Shallow Foundation; ASCE Press
Ted Tse, Ka-Ming Lee and Ted Lam, 2024, Use of Compressible Layer for Raft Footing Design with Winkler Method: The HKIE Geotechnical Division Annual Seminar 2024
The Buildings Department. Code of Practice for Foundation 2017: The Building Department, HKSAR
The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers. An Explanatory Handbook to the Code of Practice for Foundation 2017: Civil Engineering and Development Department, The Hong Kong Institution of Engineer
Vesic, A.B. [1961], Beams on elastic subgrade and Winkler’s Hypothesis, Proc. 5 th. Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. Found. Engrg., Paris, p.p. 845-50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.