Influence of Fracture Characteristics and the Use of Network Connectivity Index on Synthetic Rock Mass Strength Characterisation of Moderately Jointed Granite in Hong Kong

Authors

  • I.S. Haryono NOMA Consulting, Brisbane, Australia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.7.7.1

Abstract

Studies by Elmo & Stead (2010) and Stavrou et al. (2019) demonstrated that rock mass strength can be quantitatively characterised and directly linked to fracture characteristics. However, to date, rock mass classification and strength characterisation processes remain largely inductive, relying on empirical methods. It has been identified that this process is influenced by subjectivity and engineering judgement. With the rise of computing power and numerical modelling tools, engineers tend to apply and extend the use of rock mass classification system to determine rock mass strength and parameters in more advanced analyses. Typically, assessment of rock mass strength is undertaken by correlating different rock mass classification systems with the Hoek- Brown criterion for engineering and design purposes. Fracture characteristics; in terms of intensity and trace lengths, are rarely analysed in detail. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the influence of fracture characteristics on rock mass strength. The focus is on the assessment of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of moderately jointed granite, based on actual tunnel face mapping records. Virtual large scale UCS tests on Synthetic Rock Masses (SRM), which consist of Voronoi Grain-Based Models (GBM) and explicit fractures, are undertaken to determine the rock mass strengths. The results indicate that fracture characteristics poses significant influence on the SRM strengths and demonstrate that rock mass strength characterisation can be directly assessed through the Network Connectivity Index (NCI, Elmo et al. (2021), which considers explicit assessment of fracture intensity & trace lengths. Through clear correlations between rock mass strength and NCI values, this paper demonstrates that NCI provides a more robust and objective alternative to the commonly used Q'-GSI correlations in deriving rock mass strength. The findings demonstrate the importance of integrating detailed fracture assessment into rock mass classification and mapping processes, to improve reliability of rock mass strength and parameters prediction for engineering purposes.

References

Alghalandis, Y.F., Dowd, P.A. and Xu, C., 2015. Connectivity field: a measure for characterising fracture networks. Mathematical Geosciences, 47(1), pp.63-83.

Barton, N., Lien, R. and Lunde, J.J.R.M., 1974. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock mechanics, 6, pp.189-236.

Barton, N.R., 1988. Rock mass classification and tunnel reinforcement using the Q-system. In: Kirkaldie L. (ed.) Rock Classification Systems for Engineering Purposes, ASTM STP 984. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 59 88.

Barton, N.R., 2015. Forty years with the Q-system lessons and development. Keynote Lecture, Underground Design and Construction Projects, Hong Kong Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining.

Cundall, P. A., and Hart., R.D., 1984. Analysis of block test no. 1 inelastic rock Mass behavior: phase 2 - a characterization of joint behavior (final report) Itasca Consulting Group Report, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Subcontract SA-957.

Dershowitz, W.S., 1998. FracMan interactive discrete fracture feature data analysis, geometric modelling and exploration simulation. User Documentation.

Elmo, D. and Stead, D., 2010. An integrated numerical modelling discrete fracture network approach applied to the characterisation of rock mass strength of naturally fractured pillars. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 43, pp.3-19.

Elmo, D., Yang, B., Stead, D. and Rogers, S., 2021. A discrete fracture network approach to rock mass classification. In Challenges and Innovations in Geomechanics: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of IACMAG-Volume 1 16 (pp. 854-861). Springer International Publishing.

Elmo, D., 2023. The Bologna Interpretation of Rock Bridges. Geosciences, 13(2), pp.33 33.

Erharter, G.H., 2024. Rock mass structure characterization considering finite and folded discontinuities: A parametric study. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 57(7), pp.5229-5249.

Ghazvinian, E., Diederichs, M.S. and Quey, R., 2014. 3D random Voronoi grain-based models for simulation of brittle rock damage and fabric-guided micro-fracturing. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 6(6), pp.506-521.

Haryono, I.S., Rogers, S.F., Barrett, S.V.L. and McQueen, L.B., 2024. Improved reliability in rock mass characterisation for underground support design Discrete fracture network model and site observation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 147, p.105740.

Hoek, E. 1994. Strength of rock and rock masses. ISRM News Journal, 2, 4 16.

Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C. and Corkum, B., 2002. Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proceedings of NARMS-Tac, 1(1), pp.267-273.

Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T., 2019. The Hoek Brown failure criterion and GSI 2018 edition. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 11(3), pp.445-463.

Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2019) UDEC - Universal Distinct Element Code, Ver. 6.0. Minneapolis: Itasca.

Itasca, 2011. Long-term geomechanical stability analysis: OPGs deep geological repository for low & intermediate level waste. Technical Report, NWMO DGR-TR-2011-17.

Kaiser, P.K., 2019. From common to best practices in underground rock engineering. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (ISRM 2019). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 141 182.

Miyoshi, T., Elmo, D. and Rogers, S., 2018. Influence of data analysis when exploiting DFN model representation in the application of rock mass classification systems. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10(6), pp.1046-1062.

Pells, P.J., Bieniawski, Z.T., Hencher, S.R. and Pells, S.E., 2017. Rock quality designation (RQD): time to rest in peace. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54(6), pp.825-834.

Potyondy, D.O. and Cundall, P.A., 2004. A bonded-particle model for rock. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 41(8), pp.1329-1364.

Sharif, L.K., Elmo, D. and Stead, D., 2019. Improving DFN-geomechanical model integration using a novel automated approach. Computers and Geotechnics, 105, pp.228-248.

Stavrou, A., Vazaios, I., Murphy, W. and Vlachopoulos, N., 2019. Refined approaches for estimating the strength of rock blocks. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37, pp.5409-5439.

Yang, B., Mitelman, A., Elmo, D. and Stead, D., 2022., Why the future of rock mass classification systems requires revisiting their empirical past. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 55(1), pp.qjegh2021-039.

Wan, H.L.A, 2018. Numerical Simulation of UCS Test of Rocks Based on PFC3D Modelling. MSc. Thesis. The University of Hong Kong.

Wu, P.K.K., Chan, C.T.H. and Tsui, R.W.S., 2024. A review of the Q-system and the GSI based on recent tunnel and cavern projects in Hong Kong. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, pp.1-13.

Xu, C., Dowd, P.A., Mardia, K.V. and Fowell, R.J., 2006. A connectivity index for discrete fracture networks. Mathematical geology, 38, pp.611-634.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21

How to Cite

[1]
I.S. Haryono, “Influence of Fracture Characteristics and the Use of Network Connectivity Index on Synthetic Rock Mass Strength Characterisation of Moderately Jointed Granite in Hong Kong”, AIJR Proc., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1–12, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.21467/proceedings.7.7.1.